<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66439</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s status as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1978-79. The notice issued under section 17B was considered a procedural irregularity but not illegal. Regarding double taxation, the Tribunal restored the Wealth Tax Officer&#039;s order for the assessment year 1975-76, with adjustments for tax paid in the individual&#039;s hands. The appeal for the assessment year 1978-79 was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:45:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104874" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 132 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66439</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s status as Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) for the assessment years 1975-76 and 1978-79. The notice issued under section 17B was considered a procedural irregularity but not illegal. Regarding double taxation, the Tribunal restored the Wealth Tax Officer&#039;s order for the assessment year 1975-76, with adjustments for tax paid in the individual&#039;s hands. The appeal for the assessment year 1978-79 was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>