<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66438</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, subject to the provision of a proper audit certificate covering the entire expenditure. They emphasized that the entire expenditure on the approved programme during the accounting year should be allowed, except for Rs. 18,833 incurred before the application date, even under strict interpretation. The appeal was partly allowed, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:44:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (1) TMI 131 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66438</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, subject to the provision of a proper audit certificate covering the entire expenditure. They emphasized that the entire expenditure on the approved programme during the accounting year should be allowed, except for Rs. 18,833 incurred before the application date, even under strict interpretation. The appeal was partly allowed, providing relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>