<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 154 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66409</link>
    <description>Rule 10(2) of the Gift-tax Rules applies only where private company shares can be valued by reference to the company&#039;s total assets in a commercially realistic sense. Where transfer restrictions, non-marketability, and discounting mean that a balance-sheet based break-up computation does not reflect real value, the shares fall outside rule 10(2) and must be valued on market-value principles. For a going concern, the yield method is the governing approach recognised in Supreme Court valuation decisions. On the facts described, the break-up method was rejected, the yield or market-value basis was applied, and the appellate valuation was sustained while the departmental appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:40:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104844" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 154 - ITAT HYDERABAD-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66409</link>
      <description>Rule 10(2) of the Gift-tax Rules applies only where private company shares can be valued by reference to the company&#039;s total assets in a commercially realistic sense. Where transfer restrictions, non-marketability, and discounting mean that a balance-sheet based break-up computation does not reflect real value, the shares fall outside rule 10(2) and must be valued on market-value principles. For a going concern, the yield method is the governing approach recognised in Supreme Court valuation decisions. On the facts described, the break-up method was rejected, the yield or market-value basis was applied, and the appellate valuation was sustained while the departmental appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>