<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 248 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66382</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the interest payment was compensatory and not penal. Therefore, section 43B of the Income-tax Act did not apply, leading to the deletion of the disallowance initially made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A). The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 11:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104817" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 248 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66382</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the interest payment was compensatory and not penal. Therefore, section 43B of the Income-tax Act did not apply, leading to the deletion of the disallowance initially made by the Assessing Officer and upheld by the CIT(A). The appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>