<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (1) TMI 190 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and directed the CIT(A) to reassess the cases on merits, considering additional evidence and providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessees to be heard. The Tribunal quashed the corrigendum orders issued under Section 154 due to the violation of principles of natural justice and the inadequacy of opportunity given to the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (1) TMI 190 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for statistical purposes and directed the CIT(A) to reassess the cases on merits, considering additional evidence and providing a reasonable opportunity for the assessees to be heard. The Tribunal quashed the corrigendum orders issued under Section 154 due to the violation of principles of natural justice and the inadequacy of opportunity given to the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>