https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66344 The Tribunal upheld the Wealth Tax Officer's valuation of a property using the rent capitalization method for assessment years 1980-81, 1981-82, and 1982-83, rejecting the Commissioner of Income Tax's direction to refer the valuation to the Valuation Cell. The Tribunal also directed a re-examination of the inclusion of amounts due from S/Shri S.N. Chenoy and D.B. Mistry in the assessee's wealth for 1981-82 and 1982-83, emphasizing the need for consistency in assessments. en-us Mon, 28 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:50:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66344 The Tribunal upheld the Wealth Tax Officer's valuation of a property using the rent capitalization method for assessment years 1980-81, 1981-82, and 1982-83, rejecting the Commissioner of Income Tax's direction to refer the valuation to the Valuation Cell. The Tribunal also directed a re-examination of the inclusion of amounts due from S/Shri S.N. Chenoy and D.B. Mistry in the assessee's wealth for 1981-82 and 1982-83, emphasizing the need for consistency in assessments. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Mon, 28 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66344