<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (4) TMI 102 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66338</link>
    <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s valuation method for the closing stock of cake and oil. It found the ITO&#039;s reliance on advances received from consignees as the value of the closing stock to be erroneous, noting the lack of evidence that the advances represented the actual cost or market value of the goods. The tribunal remanded the issue to the ITO for verification of figures and computations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:36:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (4) TMI 102 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66338</link>
      <description>The tribunal partly allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s valuation method for the closing stock of cake and oil. It found the ITO&#039;s reliance on advances received from consignees as the value of the closing stock to be erroneous, noting the lack of evidence that the advances represented the actual cost or market value of the goods. The tribunal remanded the issue to the ITO for verification of figures and computations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>