<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (2) TMI 126 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66321</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by maintaining income estimates for two lorries and reducing the estimate for one. It clarified that the insurance amount received should not be included in the profit calculation under section 41(2) concerning the sale of a lorry. The matter was remanded to the Income Tax Officer for recalculating the profit without considering the insurance amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:41:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (2) TMI 126 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66321</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by maintaining income estimates for two lorries and reducing the estimate for one. It clarified that the insurance amount received should not be included in the profit calculation under section 41(2) concerning the sale of a lorry. The matter was remanded to the Income Tax Officer for recalculating the profit without considering the insurance amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>