<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 139 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66313</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad-A ruled in favor of the firm in an assessment dispute regarding interest income. The Tribunal found that the partners&#039; actions and intentions, as evidenced by their tax returns and capital account balances, indicated that the deposits and interest were individual property rather than belonging to the firm. Consequently, the interest income was excluded from the firm&#039;s assessment for the relevant year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:21:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104748" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 139 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66313</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad-A ruled in favor of the firm in an assessment dispute regarding interest income. The Tribunal found that the partners&#039; actions and intentions, as evidenced by their tax returns and capital account balances, indicated that the deposits and interest were individual property rather than belonging to the firm. Consequently, the interest income was excluded from the firm&#039;s assessment for the relevant year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>