<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 75 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66306</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalties imposed by the Income Tax Officer. The Tribunal found the explanations provided regarding the source of funds for the land purchase and unaccounted marriage and domestic expenses to be plausible, lacking evidence of income concealment. Therefore, the penalties under section 271(1)(c) were deemed unjustified and were consequently canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:09:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104741" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 75 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66306</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, canceling the penalties imposed by the Income Tax Officer. The Tribunal found the explanations provided regarding the source of funds for the land purchase and unaccounted marriage and domestic expenses to be plausible, lacking evidence of income concealment. Therefore, the penalties under section 271(1)(c) were deemed unjustified and were consequently canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>