<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66295</link>
    <description>A partnership firm&#039;s genuineness for registration was assessed with reference to the absence of capital contribution by one partner and minor inconsistencies in his sworn statement. Absence of capital contribution was treated as insufficient, by itself, to invalidate partnership status in law, and the discrepancies were considered too trifling to undermine the firm&#039;s existence. On an overall appraisal of the facts, the firm was found genuine and entitled to registration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:41:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104730" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (9) TMI 99 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66295</link>
      <description>A partnership firm&#039;s genuineness for registration was assessed with reference to the absence of capital contribution by one partner and minor inconsistencies in his sworn statement. Absence of capital contribution was treated as insufficient, by itself, to invalidate partnership status in law, and the discrepancies were considered too trifling to undermine the firm&#039;s existence. On an overall appraisal of the facts, the firm was found genuine and entitled to registration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>