<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (8) TMI 79 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66281</link>
    <description>The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objection was allowed, affirming the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(a) for the assessment year 1969-70. The Tribunal found that the firm had no taxable income, was not obligated to file a return voluntarily, and the extension application had been submitted within a limited duration. Therefore, the penalty was deemed unjustified and rightfully canceled by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, a decision upheld by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:04:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (8) TMI 79 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66281</link>
      <description>The Department&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross objection was allowed, affirming the cancellation of the penalty under section 271(1)(a) for the assessment year 1969-70. The Tribunal found that the firm had no taxable income, was not obligated to file a return voluntarily, and the extension application had been submitted within a limited duration. Therefore, the penalty was deemed unjustified and rightfully canceled by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner, a decision upheld by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>