<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 124 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that a reassessment based on a notice served after the limitation period is invalid. Emphasizing the necessity for timely notice issuance and service within the prescribed period, the decision underscored the significance of adherence to procedural requirements in tax reassessment to uphold jurisdiction and validity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 13:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 124 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that a reassessment based on a notice served after the limitation period is invalid. Emphasizing the necessity for timely notice issuance and service within the prescribed period, the decision underscored the significance of adherence to procedural requirements in tax reassessment to uphold jurisdiction and validity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>