<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (3) TMI 59 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66268</link>
    <description>A clear and communicated intention to sever joint family status operates as an immediate severance in status, even if some properties remain undivided for the time being. After such severance, the undivided properties are held as tenants in common unless there is a contrary agreement. On that basis, the lineal descendants&#039; shares in the joint family properties could not be aggregated with the deceased&#039;s share for rate purposes under section 34(1)(c) read with section 7 of the Estate Duty Act. The aggregation made by the authorities was therefore unsustainable, and only the deceased&#039;s 1/5th share in the immovable properties was liable to assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (3) TMI 59 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66268</link>
      <description>A clear and communicated intention to sever joint family status operates as an immediate severance in status, even if some properties remain undivided for the time being. After such severance, the undivided properties are held as tenants in common unless there is a contrary agreement. On that basis, the lineal descendants&#039; shares in the joint family properties could not be aggregated with the deceased&#039;s share for rate purposes under section 34(1)(c) read with section 7 of the Estate Duty Act. The aggregation made by the authorities was therefore unsustainable, and only the deceased&#039;s 1/5th share in the immovable properties was liable to assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>