<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (6) TMI 45 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66255</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessing officer exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing rate differences under section 147(b) after reopening the assessment under section 147(a) beyond the prescribed period. It emphasized the distinction between the two sections and the need for proper grounds for invoking each. The Tribunal ruled that once an assessment is finalized, it cannot be revisited unless through legal means, stating that the assessing officer&#039;s power under section 147(a) does not extend to matters falling under section 147(b) after the time limit. The reassessment was canceled, and the original assessment was restored, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:04:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (6) TMI 45 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66255</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessing officer exceeded jurisdiction by disallowing rate differences under section 147(b) after reopening the assessment under section 147(a) beyond the prescribed period. It emphasized the distinction between the two sections and the need for proper grounds for invoking each. The Tribunal ruled that once an assessment is finalized, it cannot be revisited unless through legal means, stating that the assessing officer&#039;s power under section 147(a) does not extend to matters falling under section 147(b) after the time limit. The reassessment was canceled, and the original assessment was restored, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>