<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 303 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals. It approved the provision for wage revisions under the IDA pay scale, deeming it allowable. However, it rejected the claims concerning the deduction under section 80HHC, the expenditure on Arki Limestone deposits, and the write-off of miscellaneous losses due to insufficient evidence and non-compliance with accounting standards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104683" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 303 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals. It approved the provision for wage revisions under the IDA pay scale, deeming it allowable. However, it rejected the claims concerning the deduction under section 80HHC, the expenditure on Arki Limestone deposits, and the write-off of miscellaneous losses due to insufficient evidence and non-compliance with accounting standards.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>