<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 313 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxability of professional fees received by the assessee after becoming a High Court Judge, following jurisdictional High Court precedent. It allowed the deduction of expenses incurred to earn the fees, emphasizing the deductibility of such expenses even from discontinued business or profession. The Tribunal criticized the Revenue for not adhering to CBDT instructions, dismissing their appeal and maintaining the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision. It highlighted the importance of following CBDT instructions and criticized the Assessing Officer for baseless adverse observations against a constitutional functionary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 17:45:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 313 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the taxability of professional fees received by the assessee after becoming a High Court Judge, following jurisdictional High Court precedent. It allowed the deduction of expenses incurred to earn the fees, emphasizing the deductibility of such expenses even from discontinued business or profession. The Tribunal criticized the Revenue for not adhering to CBDT instructions, dismissing their appeal and maintaining the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision. It highlighted the importance of following CBDT instructions and criticized the Assessing Officer for baseless adverse observations against a constitutional functionary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>