<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 269 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66228</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by preventing double taxation of Rs. 1,15,27,120 and permitting a deduction of Rs. 31,48,048 for payments made towards stockists&#039; claims. The Tribunal concluded that the liability towards stockists was not definite in the accounting year 1998-99, and only actual payments made in that year could be considered, suggesting that other payments be addressed in subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:59:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 269 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66228</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal by preventing double taxation of Rs. 1,15,27,120 and permitting a deduction of Rs. 31,48,048 for payments made towards stockists&#039; claims. The Tribunal concluded that the liability towards stockists was not definite in the accounting year 1998-99, and only actual payments made in that year could be considered, suggesting that other payments be addressed in subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>