https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66223 The Tribunal held that despite the assessee's compliance with the 30% Voluntary Disclosure Scheme, the Assessing Officer erred in subjecting the assessment to scrutiny. The Tribunal found that the assessee met the conditions outlined in the press-release and concluded that the Revenue authorities were bound by the principle of promissory estoppel not to scrutinize the case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the scrutiny assessment and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The assessee's appeal was allowed, resulting in the cancellation of the scrutiny assessment and additions. en-us Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:44:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66223 The Tribunal held that despite the assessee's compliance with the 30% Voluntary Disclosure Scheme, the Assessing Officer erred in subjecting the assessment to scrutiny. The Tribunal found that the assessee met the conditions outlined in the press-release and concluded that the Revenue authorities were bound by the principle of promissory estoppel not to scrutinize the case. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the scrutiny assessment and additions made by the Assessing Officer. The assessee's appeal was allowed, resulting in the cancellation of the scrutiny assessment and additions. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 20 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66223