<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 216 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s decision to disallow share issue expenses and consultancy charges as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1995-96. The Tribunal ruled that even abortive capital expenditure must be disallowed, emphasizing that the nature of the expenditure is determined by its object, not its end result. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no other grounds raised were accepted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:30:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 216 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Revenue&#039;s decision to disallow share issue expenses and consultancy charges as revenue expenditure for the assessment year 1995-96. The Tribunal ruled that even abortive capital expenditure must be disallowed, emphasizing that the nature of the expenditure is determined by its object, not its end result. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and no other grounds raised were accepted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>