<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (7) TMI 158 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66217</link>
    <description>The appellate authority upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the departmental appeals. The surplus from the sale of the plots was not deemed an adventure in the nature of trade, and the lands were regarded as agricultural for tax purposes. The alternative argument to tax the income as business income was rejected due to insufficient supporting evidence on record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:27:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (7) TMI 158 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66217</link>
      <description>The appellate authority upheld the first appellate authority&#039;s decision, dismissing the departmental appeals. The surplus from the sale of the plots was not deemed an adventure in the nature of trade, and the lands were regarded as agricultural for tax purposes. The alternative argument to tax the income as business income was rejected due to insufficient supporting evidence on record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>