<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (5) TMI 74 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the classification of rental income as &quot;Income from House Property&quot; rather than &quot;Profits and Gains of Business or Profession.&quot; The decision was based on the nature of the partnership&#039;s activities, lease agreement terms, and relevant judicial precedents. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower authorities&#039; classification of the income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 15:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (5) TMI 74 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the classification of rental income as &quot;Income from House Property&quot; rather than &quot;Profits and Gains of Business or Profession.&quot; The decision was based on the nature of the partnership&#039;s activities, lease agreement terms, and relevant judicial precedents. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower authorities&#039; classification of the income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>