<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (7) TMI 130 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66201</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeals, ruling that the reopening of assessments under Section 147(a) was invalid. The additions based on the Departmental Valuer&#039;s report were deemed unjustified as the assessee&#039;s declared construction cost was supported by proper account books and vouchers, which were not rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of rejecting account books before relying on valuation reports for additions. The cross-objections filed by the assessee were dismissed as well.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 11:18:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (7) TMI 130 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66201</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the departmental appeals, ruling that the reopening of assessments under Section 147(a) was invalid. The additions based on the Departmental Valuer&#039;s report were deemed unjustified as the assessee&#039;s declared construction cost was supported by proper account books and vouchers, which were not rejected. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of rejecting account books before relying on valuation reports for additions. The cross-objections filed by the assessee were dismissed as well.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>