<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 89 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66195</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s valuation method for closing stock (paddy and broken rice) based on the average cost method. It allowed the deduction of Rs. 10,000 related to an employee&#039;s advances for traveling expenses, considering it a legitimate business expense due to the employee&#039;s long service and customary practices. However, the tribunal upheld the denial of depreciation on a diesel engine due to the lack of evidence regarding its purchase and installation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 89 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66195</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, upholding the assessee&#039;s valuation method for closing stock (paddy and broken rice) based on the average cost method. It allowed the deduction of Rs. 10,000 related to an employee&#039;s advances for traveling expenses, considering it a legitimate business expense due to the employee&#039;s long service and customary practices. However, the tribunal upheld the denial of depreciation on a diesel engine due to the lack of evidence regarding its purchase and installation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>