<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (7) TMI 183 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66151</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that payments made to partners for acting in films were not subject to disallowance under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal reasoned that the payments were for acting services, not as remuneration for their roles as partners in the firm. Relying on precedents and distinguishing the nature of the payments, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the disallowance made by the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:59:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (7) TMI 183 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66151</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that payments made to partners for acting in films were not subject to disallowance under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal reasoned that the payments were for acting services, not as remuneration for their roles as partners in the firm. Relying on precedents and distinguishing the nature of the payments, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of the disallowance made by the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>