https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66146 The Tribunal upheld the AAC's order, dismissing the appeal. It found that the assessee failed to prove he was a benamidar for his minor son and that the entire share income was assessable in his hands. The argument of double taxation was rejected, with the option for the assessee to seek cancellation of the minor's assessment. The Tribunal also ruled that the levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was not appealable, citing precedent. en-us Thu, 13 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:48:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66146 The Tribunal upheld the AAC's order, dismissing the appeal. It found that the assessee failed to prove he was a benamidar for his minor son and that the entire share income was assessable in his hands. The argument of double taxation was rejected, with the option for the assessee to seek cancellation of the minor's assessment. The Tribunal also ruled that the levy of interest under sections 139(8) and 215 was not appealable, citing precedent. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Feb 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66146