<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 176 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66141</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the development rebate and investment allowance should not be withdrawn. The Tribunal upheld the weighted deduction under section 35B as directed by the Commissioner (Appeals). It emphasized that the agreement between the assessee and the lessee was a bailment, not a transfer, and therefore did not justify the withdrawal of the allowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:39:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 176 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66141</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee. It held that the development rebate and investment allowance should not be withdrawn. The Tribunal upheld the weighted deduction under section 35B as directed by the Commissioner (Appeals). It emphasized that the agreement between the assessee and the lessee was a bailment, not a transfer, and therefore did not justify the withdrawal of the allowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>