<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (5) TMI 146 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66126</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by permitting deductions for legal expenditures and upholding the 50% deduction under section 48(2)(b)(i)(B). However, the exemption under section 54F for constructing a residential house was denied, and the interest levied under section 234B was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:52:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (5) TMI 146 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66126</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals by permitting deductions for legal expenditures and upholding the 50% deduction under section 48(2)(b)(i)(B). However, the exemption under section 54F for constructing a residential house was denied, and the interest levied under section 234B was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>