<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 172 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66117</link>
    <description>Interest received for the period between taking possession of acquired land and the award was treated as compensation for deprivation of the owner&#039;s use and enjoyment of the land, because ownership had not yet passed to the Government until the award. It was therefore characterised as a capital receipt rather than interest on compensation after completed acquisition, and was not chargeable to income-tax; the addition was rightly deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:24:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 172 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66117</link>
      <description>Interest received for the period between taking possession of acquired land and the award was treated as compensation for deprivation of the owner&#039;s use and enjoyment of the land, because ownership had not yet passed to the Government until the award. It was therefore characterised as a capital receipt rather than interest on compensation after completed acquisition, and was not chargeable to income-tax; the addition was rightly deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66117</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>