<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 152 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66103</link>
    <description>Dispute concerns classification of shares, depreciation claims on hire-purchase assets, interest liabilities, and condonation of delay in income-tax appeals. Tribunal condoned a 12-day delay as reasonable. For 198889 the Tribunal held shares treated as investments (not stock-in-trade) and disallowed deduction for diminution in value; interest levied under interest provision was sustained. For 198990 appreciation in share value deleted as irrelevant since shares were investments; deletion of interest under interest provision was set aside in part. For 198990/199091 depreciation on hire-purchase assets was disallowed where accounting change was unproven, while add-back of depreciation under summary adjustment was not sustained where prima facie adjustment was debatable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 152 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66103</link>
      <description>Dispute concerns classification of shares, depreciation claims on hire-purchase assets, interest liabilities, and condonation of delay in income-tax appeals. Tribunal condoned a 12-day delay as reasonable. For 198889 the Tribunal held shares treated as investments (not stock-in-trade) and disallowed deduction for diminution in value; interest levied under interest provision was sustained. For 198990 appreciation in share value deleted as irrelevant since shares were investments; deletion of interest under interest provision was set aside in part. For 198990/199091 depreciation on hire-purchase assets was disallowed where accounting change was unproven, while add-back of depreciation under summary adjustment was not sustained where prima facie adjustment was debatable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>