<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (2) TMI 118 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66080</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the refusal of registration to the assessee-firm for the assessment year 1984-85 under section 185(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It found that the partnership and retirement deeds were likely created retrospectively and that the firm did not genuinely conduct business from 1-4-1983 as claimed. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the Income-tax Officer and the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104515" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (2) TMI 118 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66080</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the refusal of registration to the assessee-firm for the assessment year 1984-85 under section 185(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It found that the partnership and retirement deeds were likely created retrospectively and that the firm did not genuinely conduct business from 1-4-1983 as claimed. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming the decisions of the Income-tax Officer and the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>