<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 145 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66070</link>
    <description>The appeals for assessment years 1974-75, 1976-77, and 1977-78 were allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the validity of reopening under section 147(a) but deleting the addition of Rs. 12,000 as a perquisite under section 28(iv) and disallowing the levy of interest under sections 215 and 139(8). The appeal for the assessment year 1978-79 was allowed for statistical purposes, with a directive for the first appellate authority to re-evaluate the facts regarding dividend income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 12:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104506" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 145 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66070</link>
      <description>The appeals for assessment years 1974-75, 1976-77, and 1977-78 were allowed, with the Tribunal upholding the validity of reopening under section 147(a) but deleting the addition of Rs. 12,000 as a perquisite under section 28(iv) and disallowing the levy of interest under sections 215 and 139(8). The appeal for the assessment year 1978-79 was allowed for statistical purposes, with a directive for the first appellate authority to re-evaluate the facts regarding dividend income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>