<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (4) TMI 186 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66054</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner for fresh adjudication on the merits, particularly focusing on condoning the two-month delay in filing the registration application. The Tribunal emphasized a flexible interpretation of &quot;sufficient cause&quot; to serve substantial justice, citing judicial precedents. The delay from 19-2-1986 to 24-3-1989 was deemed worthy of condonation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:27:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (4) TMI 186 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66054</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the Appellate Assistant Commissioner for fresh adjudication on the merits, particularly focusing on condoning the two-month delay in filing the registration application. The Tribunal emphasized a flexible interpretation of &quot;sufficient cause&quot; to serve substantial justice, citing judicial precedents. The delay from 19-2-1986 to 24-3-1989 was deemed worthy of condonation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>