<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (6) TMI 109 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66050</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding adjustments for valuation due to uncertainties, hazards, and risks of litigation. It confirmed the creation of multiple trusts through a single document, directed exemption for &quot;art treasures&quot; under section 5(1)(xii), and allowed fictional Estate duty liability as a deduction. The applicability of section 21(1A) was limited to assessments under section 21(1).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:02:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (6) TMI 109 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66050</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, upholding adjustments for valuation due to uncertainties, hazards, and risks of litigation. It confirmed the creation of multiple trusts through a single document, directed exemption for &quot;art treasures&quot; under section 5(1)(xii), and allowed fictional Estate duty liability as a deduction. The applicability of section 21(1A) was limited to assessments under section 21(1).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>