<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 170 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66041</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessments under Section 21(1) were invalid as the right to wear jewellery did not constitute an asset under Section 2(e) and the particulars of beneficiaries were not specified. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the assessments were cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 170 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66041</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the assessments under Section 21(1) were invalid as the right to wear jewellery did not constitute an asset under Section 2(e) and the particulars of beneficiaries were not specified. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the assessments were cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>