<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (1) TMI 175 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66037</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The continuous use of the property was not deemed a prerequisite, and the substantial payment and possession of the new property within the stipulated period satisfied the exemption criteria. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:27:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (1) TMI 175 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66037</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 54(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The continuous use of the property was not deemed a prerequisite, and the substantial payment and possession of the new property within the stipulated period satisfied the exemption criteria. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66037</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>