<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the excess amounts retained by the assessee over the actual expenses incurred in publicity and advertisements were not required to be refunded to the producers and were considered as receipts in the business of film distribution. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that the surplus amounts saved from the budgeted expenditure did not need to be refunded, as there was no contractual obligation to do so.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:02:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the excess amounts retained by the assessee over the actual expenses incurred in publicity and advertisements were not required to be refunded to the producers and were considered as receipts in the business of film distribution. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming that the surplus amounts saved from the budgeted expenditure did not need to be refunded, as there was no contractual obligation to do so.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>