<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 147 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing the weighted deduction under section 35B, determining that the payment to EPI constituted a commission for services related to export. The cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed due to a significant delay and lack of essential facts on record. The departmental appeal was partially allowed, and the cross-objection was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:58:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 147 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing the weighted deduction under section 35B, determining that the payment to EPI constituted a commission for services related to export. The cross-objection by the assessee was dismissed due to a significant delay and lack of essential facts on record. The departmental appeal was partially allowed, and the cross-objection was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>