<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 112 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66011</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the orders of the AAC, ruling in favor of the assessees, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals. It was determined that a godown could be considered a &#039;house&#039; for the purpose of granting exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, based on the broad interpretation of the term &#039;house&#039; encompassing structures beyond mere dwelling places, as established by legal precedents and the CBDT circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:08:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 112 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66011</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the orders of the AAC, ruling in favor of the assessees, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals. It was determined that a godown could be considered a &#039;house&#039; for the purpose of granting exemption under section 5(1)(iv) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, based on the broad interpretation of the term &#039;house&#039; encompassing structures beyond mere dwelling places, as established by legal precedents and the CBDT circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=66011</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>