<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (2) TMI 175 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on a printing and stationery firm for non-payment of self-assessment tax, despite the firm&#039;s claim of financial difficulties. The Tribunal found the firm&#039;s explanation unconvincing, considering available cash balances and lack of evidence of capital blockage. It concluded that the partners&#039; potential resources and absence of insurmountable obstacles did not justify non-payment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that while financial difficulties could be a valid defense in some cases, it was not acceptable in this instance due to insufficient evidence and delayed tax payment initiation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:26:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (2) TMI 175 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld penalties imposed on a printing and stationery firm for non-payment of self-assessment tax, despite the firm&#039;s claim of financial difficulties. The Tribunal found the firm&#039;s explanation unconvincing, considering available cash balances and lack of evidence of capital blockage. It concluded that the partners&#039; potential resources and absence of insurmountable obstacles did not justify non-payment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, emphasizing that while financial difficulties could be a valid defense in some cases, it was not acceptable in this instance due to insufficient evidence and delayed tax payment initiation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>