<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 134 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65953</link>
    <description>For wealth-tax rate purposes, the relevant inquiry was whether a person with taxable wealth was a member of, or otherwise interested in, the HUF property under assessment. The majority held that a female member of a Hindu joint family can validly relinquish her interest in joint family property, and on the facts the karta&#039;s wife had ceased to have an assessable interest after her deed of relinquishment. Her separate taxable wealth therefore could not be treated as wealth of a person interested in the assessed HUF. The assessee-HUF was not liable to be assessed as a specified HUF at the higher rate, and the Commissioner&#039;s direction was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 14:41:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 134 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65953</link>
      <description>For wealth-tax rate purposes, the relevant inquiry was whether a person with taxable wealth was a member of, or otherwise interested in, the HUF property under assessment. The majority held that a female member of a Hindu joint family can validly relinquish her interest in joint family property, and on the facts the karta&#039;s wife had ceased to have an assessable interest after her deed of relinquishment. Her separate taxable wealth therefore could not be treated as wealth of a person interested in the assessed HUF. The assessee-HUF was not liable to be assessed as a specified HUF at the higher rate, and the Commissioner&#039;s direction was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>