<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (3) TMI 118 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65944</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee the depreciation claim on the jointly owned plant and machinery. The Tribunal concluded that since the assessee was the full owner of half the asset and earned income from it, they were entitled to depreciation, distinguishing the case from the Allahabad High Court decision. The Tribunal emphasized that income from jointly exploited assets could be assessed separately for each owner, and in this case, the income was assessed separately for the owners, including the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 13:48:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (3) TMI 118 - ITAT HYDERABAD-A</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65944</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting the assessee the depreciation claim on the jointly owned plant and machinery. The Tribunal concluded that since the assessee was the full owner of half the asset and earned income from it, they were entitled to depreciation, distinguishing the case from the Allahabad High Court decision. The Tribunal emphasized that income from jointly exploited assets could be assessed separately for each owner, and in this case, the income was assessed separately for the owners, including the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>