<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 166 -  ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s revisionary order under Section 263, finding it justified. The valuation report, received after assessment, was deemed part of the assessment record. The CIT&#039;s direction for a fresh assessment, allowing the assessee to object, ensured compliance with natural justice principles. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:40:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 166 -  ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax&#039;s revisionary order under Section 263, finding it justified. The valuation report, received after assessment, was deemed part of the assessment record. The CIT&#039;s direction for a fresh assessment, allowing the assessee to object, ensured compliance with natural justice principles. As a result, the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>