<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 289 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65912</link>
    <description>The case involved determining whether the purchase and sale of land constituted an adventure in the nature of trade and the correct assessment category for the income, either &quot;Business income&quot; or &quot;Capital gains.&quot; The Tribunal was divided on the first issue, with the President concluding it was an adventure in the nature of trade. Regarding the assessment category, the Judicial Member supported &quot;Capital gains,&quot; while the Accountant Member and the President favored &quot;Business income.&quot; The Tribunal upheld the order under section 263, directing the assessment of income as &quot;Business income.&quot; Ultimately, the profits from the land transactions were deemed taxable as income from business.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:27:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104348" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 289 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65912</link>
      <description>The case involved determining whether the purchase and sale of land constituted an adventure in the nature of trade and the correct assessment category for the income, either &quot;Business income&quot; or &quot;Capital gains.&quot; The Tribunal was divided on the first issue, with the President concluding it was an adventure in the nature of trade. Regarding the assessment category, the Judicial Member supported &quot;Capital gains,&quot; while the Accountant Member and the President favored &quot;Business income.&quot; The Tribunal upheld the order under section 263, directing the assessment of income as &quot;Business income.&quot; Ultimately, the profits from the land transactions were deemed taxable as income from business.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>