<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (6) TMI 86 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that the properties bequeathed under the will should be considered individual income, as the will indicated the properties were given to the sons individually with full rights, without specifying joint family ownership. The order of the Appellate Authority Commissioner was reversed, and the Income Tax Officer&#039;s assessments were upheld for all relevant years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:16:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (6) TMI 86 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that the properties bequeathed under the will should be considered individual income, as the will indicated the properties were given to the sons individually with full rights, without specifying joint family ownership. The order of the Appellate Authority Commissioner was reversed, and the Income Tax Officer&#039;s assessments were upheld for all relevant years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>