https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65907 The Tribunal confirmed the Appellate Authority Commissioner's decision to include property income in the assessment of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). It ruled that the property, owned by the HUF, used for the firm's business where the HUF was a partner, should be considered separate from the HUF's income. As the HUF cannot be a partner in the firm, the property income was deemed distinct from the share-income. Consequently, the appeals filed by the HUF were dismissed. en-us Tue, 18 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Feb 2011 12:13:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65907 The Tribunal confirmed the Appellate Authority Commissioner's decision to include property income in the assessment of a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF). It ruled that the property, owned by the HUF, used for the firm's business where the HUF was a partner, should be considered separate from the HUF's income. As the HUF cannot be a partner in the firm, the property income was deemed distinct from the share-income. Consequently, the appeals filed by the HUF were dismissed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 18 May 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65907