<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 97 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65878</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the payment of Rs. 8,625 towards electricity charges was allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal differentiated the case from cited precedents, emphasizing the necessity of the payment for maintaining electricity connection crucial for manufacturing activities. It concluded that the payment was not in contravention of the law or subject to penalties, aligning with principles supporting deductibility of payments essential for business continuity. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and declined to intervene, based on the justification provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 97 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65878</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the payment of Rs. 8,625 towards electricity charges was allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal differentiated the case from cited precedents, emphasizing the necessity of the payment for maintaining electricity connection crucial for manufacturing activities. It concluded that the payment was not in contravention of the law or subject to penalties, aligning with principles supporting deductibility of payments essential for business continuity. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) and declined to intervene, based on the justification provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65878</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>