<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 288 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the mandatory document submission rule under Rule 9(1) of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. The appeal was rejected due to missing documents and failure to file an application for acceptance without the required paperwork. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of serving grounds of appeal and statement of facts to the Assessing Officer for a fair hearing. The Tribunal clarified that proceedings before the first appellate authority constitute the first appeal, making any subsequent appeal to the Tribunal a second appeal, with Rule 9 requirements being mandatory for both the Department and the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:49:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104277" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 288 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Department&#039;s appeal for non-compliance with the mandatory document submission rule under Rule 9(1) of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. The appeal was rejected due to missing documents and failure to file an application for acceptance without the required paperwork. Additionally, the Tribunal emphasized the necessity of serving grounds of appeal and statement of facts to the Assessing Officer for a fair hearing. The Tribunal clarified that proceedings before the first appellate authority constitute the first appeal, making any subsequent appeal to the Tribunal a second appeal, with Rule 9 requirements being mandatory for both the Department and the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>