<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 279 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65836</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the AO to delete disallowances and additions related to general charges, bamboo cultivation, and Section 41(1) addition. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition of sales tax collected but not deposited, stating that it forms part of trading receipts and must be included in income if not paid to the government.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:44:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 279 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65836</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by directing the AO to delete disallowances and additions related to general charges, bamboo cultivation, and Section 41(1) addition. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition of sales tax collected but not deposited, stating that it forms part of trading receipts and must be included in income if not paid to the government.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65836</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>