<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 108 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by condoning the delay in filing the appeal and admitting it. It upheld the disallowance of interest on borrowed capital relating to the residential portion of the building, agreeing with the first appellate authority. However, it overturned the decision on deductions for electric charges, chowkidar, and sweeper salaries in computing income from house property, stating these expenses were not covered under relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:42:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=104271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 108 - ITAT GAUHATI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by condoning the delay in filing the appeal and admitting it. It upheld the disallowance of interest on borrowed capital relating to the residential portion of the building, agreeing with the first appellate authority. However, it overturned the decision on deductions for electric charges, chowkidar, and sweeper salaries in computing income from house property, stating these expenses were not covered under relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=65834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>